today.  On the one side are egalitarian and counter-imperial readings that stake their interpretation of the liberating gospel upon a depiction of the Pauline church as radically countercultural with regard to leadership and authority.  On the other side or authoritarian readings that just as easily conceive of Paul as fully embedded within the cultural conceptions and structures of leadership and authority in vogue across the Greco-Roman world.  This study employs social-science criticism to construct a model of ancient patronage conventions and power-exchange dynamics in the Greco-Roman world, and this model is then applied to 1 Corinthians.  This study finds that when Paul addresses his own apostolic relationship to the Corinthians, he tends toward re-inscribing traditional hierarchies, but that when Paul addresses relationships between participants of the Corinthian church, he tends toward overturning them.

Hide more