writing a book was the furthest from my mind. As the databases filled out and relationships emerged, so too did the questions flow. The patterns emerging across the face of the Earth that followed great circle arcs. There are three types of events that can accomplish that feat: ships at sea, aircraft in flight and inbound objects from space. The data I had, obviously was not caused by ships or aircraft, but that presented new challenges because the scientific community had not embraced this type of data before. Terminology developed and these areas were labeled "Perimeters", representing 'zones of influence'. I found them everywhere and not just on Earth and not just on other celestial bodies. They are too in the latest statistical analysis published for WMAP which those teams called "statistically improbable circles". Several Perimeters implied Events so bizarre that it made me look at what it was we all thought we knew about physics, with traditional models being M1 & M2 the process proceeded to look at Events. One such Event occurred at Atiken Basin on our moon. I wanted to know why the moon was still in one piece after such an obviously catastrophic Event. Not even NASA knew. The answer was not forthcoming from either M1 nor M2. With original physics research scattered across my desk I stood up from some of Einstein's original publications and said aloud to myself "that makes sense." I stood there a very long moment having uttered that statement before my knees literally gave out and I fell back into my chair. I sat there, head in hand or over an hour muttering "Einstein was logically correct." The implications of that statement resonated through my Systems Engineering skill set like Big Ben in London. Twelve years later, what you see in this the 5th Edition Version 39, of what were my notes, is the book "The Elegance of Reason." The Elegance of Reason takes us on a journey through Perimeters and into the very heart of physics. This path navigates 826 pages, 250 illustrations, 88 tables, 403 equations, 167 propositions, 63 thought experiments, and more to develop what has been come to be called "The Emergence Model" (M5). The Emergence Model is a super-set, inclusive, model of the Standard Model of Particle Physics recast through a different mode of thinking about the fundamental precepts of the Universe. Not as they are but as we humans have been thinking about them. A new tool developed in the book called a Translation Table encapsulates such models and compare them to one another. The article Basics on the blog for the book describes much of this use hashtags #EleganceOfReason and #EmergenceModel and you will find it. Einstein famously said "We cannot solve problems using the same thinking when we created them." Do not expect the solution from within traditional thinking - that thinking is a logic trap of epic proportions. The logic trap M1 represents is exemplified by the spacetime-mass interface, which cannot be represented by only one basis The Elegance of Reason takes concepts for intrinsic nature of a Most Basic Particle (MBPs) entangling with just two others each configured by a Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance to build out the entire Universe through fractal configurations of architectural mass. Force, all force, is the work instantiated by the intrinsic action of these relative and respective architectures of configured mass so posited by Table 3 in the book. Space is dimensionless nothing. The logical source of mathematics (geometry) is the MBP not space. Time is an action displacement index of such configurations. Through these net new considerations we take a roller coaster ride through The Elegance of Reason and for the first time in human history, unify physics.

Hide more